Minutes of EMAG committee
meeting, 19th February 2001
Present: Vincent
Nolan, Tom Lake, Michael Lister, John Gardner, Paul Braithwaite, Adrian Howard-Jones,
Alex Henney, David Browning (EMAG committee members) Jeremy Lever QC , Colin
Slater, Andrew Pike (EMAG members)
Apologies: Liz Kwantes
- Minutes of Previous
Meeting
The Minutes of the meeting held on Jan 29th. were approved.
- Agenda and Minutes
Agreed that the record of decisions and actions might be supplemented by fuller
minutes prepared by TL for the benefit of members not present.
- Counsel's Opinion
JL and AH-J reported on progress in obtaining Counsel's Opinion. AH-J had
handled difficult negotiations with the Society and their solicitors, Denton
Wilde Sapte. EMAG's submission was briefly displayed to the meeting (two volumes).
- Committee Membership
Colin Slater was invited to join the Committee
- Finance ML reported
that there was now £21,887 at the bank.
- Membership
Membership was now between 1,400 and 1,500, of which 700 had joined since
the New Year. The latest response rate for mailings was only 3.3%
- Recruitment Drive
It was agreed to suspend the Recruitment Drive for the time being
The issues were: PRO: that building up a membership with a reasonable subscription
is the only way in which members, a fair proportion of whom do not have email
or web access, can be reached and informed. Even at relatively low rates of
response the process can be more than self-funding and membership could be
increased radically before the AGM. CON: With the new chairman just arrived
and the Halifax deal done it is not clear what the immediate appeal to members
will be. The response rate is low, presumably the subscription offer is not
attractive. Defer recruitment until the issues are clearer.
- Treasury Select Committee
DB will make a further submission
- Communication to Members
We should send out a letter to all our members and tell them that the Halifax
deal does not solve the problem
- Roadshow EMAG
to seek involvement/representation in Treves Roadshow
- Litigation EMAG
must ensure that the new Board does it's duty in respect of litigation against
the former Directors and advisers. We should confirm with Treves that he will
take active steps to find out, through independent solicitors, whether there
has been a breach of duty. We support EPHAG in demanding an independent legal
audit.
Member Andrew Pike had drawn up a dossier relating in this respect which he
addressed briefly.
- EMAG Attitude to New
Chairman 'Pushy Co-operation' and 'Critical Collaboration' were suggested.
It was agreed that EMAG should continue to be pro-active. EMAG is not seeking
an alternative candidate to Vanni Treves.
It was agreed that PB should write to Peter Wilmot asking for the names of
Directors who attended the Board Meeting on Feb. 4th and were entitled to
vote on the decision to approve the Halifax deal (Done)
- Capping Negotiations
EMAG's Objective is to promote a settlement which will put a stop to the litigation.
EMAG favours a settlement and offers the services of its members to contribute.
We wish to help, to put our members in a position to decide for themselves.
EMAG should not put itself in the position of representing any sectional interest.
We are willing to co-operate in the hope of making constructive suggestions
in the general interest.
Further, EMAG could involve itself in discussions of the principles, method
of proceeding to decision and so on.It would be wise to await Leading Counsel's
opinion before moving irrevocably.
VN to write to Treves saying that we want all the information needed to arrive
at a settlement and ensure that the Warren findings are taken into account.
Vincent Nolan
|