|
Correspondence: 07/10/2002 - Letter from Alex Henney, chairman of EMAG to Vanni Treves 38 Swains Lane 7th October, 2002 Mr. Vanni
Treves Dear Treves, On 5th September I wrote as follows to Thomson:
I received the following reply from McGarahan on 16 September:
The reference to timing in Article 65 is perhaps a feature of the Articles that need modernisation and I assume (I would be grateful if you would confirm this) that the Directors have decided on an annual investigation and valuation by the Actuary. This is mentioned as occurring in the section of the Directors' Report dated 15th April 2002 headed "Valuation and bonus declaration". Article 65 refers to a "Directors' report to members", not one to a regulatory authority and quite distinct from the Accounts prepared under Article 64. The intent of Article 65 has the Actuary reporting to the Board of Directors and then the Directors reporting to the members. Please note that the phrase "Provided that in the valuation of the assets the values thereof be not estimated beyond the market prices [if any] of the same ..." would seem to imply that future income should not be included unless "for reasons to be set out in the Directors' report to the members upon the results of the valuation". The Returns to the FSA include future income. There is nothing in the Directors report to members dated 15th April 2002 on future income. I can find nothing in the Articles of Association which refer to the provision of reports and notices to members in electronic form, and so the provision of a report on the website of the Society does not meet the requirements of the Articles [see Article 69]. I checked with Mr. Roger Allen, Head of the Insurance Division of the FSA. On Friday afternoon 27 September he advised me that solvency returns "are not used for valuing the assets and declaring bonuses. Valuation and bonuses are worked out from first principles. They [i.e. solvency returns] are not a tool in that process". I repeat my request for the reports to which the members are entitled under Article 65. I would also be obliged if the Society cease trying to fob us off with obviously incorrect and misleading responses to our requests. Yours sincerely, ALEX HENNEY c.c. EMAG Committee, EMAG
Website, Board, Journalists |